Comparisons

International account comparisons

ComparisonsGlobal accountUSDIOF

Wise, Nomad, Husky and Ruvo side by side: fees, IOF, FX and what each does best, no marketing, just the numbers.

Person comparing international accounts on their phone
Receive USD from abroad
Onramp BRL → USDT
Free USD deposits
Spend with your Ruvo card
Earn yield daily
Free crypto transfers
Digital wallet

Why comparing dollar accounts starts with IOF

Most side-by-side comparisons focus on FX fees. For Brazilians moving money internationally, the dominant cost is often IOF — a federal tax that reaches 3.5% depending on the instrument and direction. A platform with slightly higher fees but zero IOF typically wins on total cost. Understanding which platforms charge IOF, and when, is the starting point for any honest comparison. The pages in this cluster show the full maths for each pair, including worked examples at real balances. Nomad vs Ruvo and Wise vs Ruvo are a good place to start.

IOF by platform and direction

Under Brazilian rules, FX IOF depends on the operation: around 3.5% on a foreign-currency current account and 1.1% on remittances meant for investment. On platforms like Nomad, incoming reais fall into these brackets depending on the operation. Ruvo works as a dollar account with 0% IOF: you receive, hold, and spend in dollars with no IOF, in either direction. To convert dollars back to reais, competitors still pass through the 0.38% IOF; with Ruvo it's 0%.

Holding dollars versus converting on arrival

The structural split across these platforms is whether you actually hold dollars. Husky routes international wire transfers through SWIFT and converts them to reais on arrival — you receive reais, not dollars. Nomad and Wise let you hold dollars but charge IOF when you fund the account with reais. Ruvo holds dollars in a US account under your control, with conversion available on demand at a flat rate. Read the Husky vs Ruvo comparison for a detailed breakdown of the receive-and-convert model.

When a flat rate beats a tier system

Nomad's FX conversion rate improves with your invested balance — from 2% at zero to 1% at Tier 5 (approximately $20,000 invested in Nomad Invest). At typical freelancer balances the rate sits at 1.5%–2%. Add the 1.1% IOF and the all-in cost is 2.6%–3.1% per conversion. Ruvo charges 0.5% flat with no minimum balance requirement. The full Nomad vs Ruvo page shows the break-even point at each tier and investment level.

B2B routing platforms: Higlobe and TechFX

Higlobe and TechFX are designed for businesses receiving dollars from a US client — not for card spending or personal accounts. Both charge around 0.3%–0.5% to convert, with no dollar card, no Pix send, and no crypto send. They are good point solutions for a company that only needs to receive and convert in volume. Ruvo adds the same dollar-holding model plus a card, Pix, crypto, and a personal account alongside the business one. Higlobe vs Ruvo and TechFX vs Ruvo compare each one directly.

How to pick the right comparison

Start with your main use case. If you freelance and want to minimise the tax on each transfer, read the IOF-focused pages. If you already invest through Nomad and want to weigh the tier benefit, the Nomad comparison shows the maths at each tier. If you invest heavily in Nomad already and the tier benefit is real for your balance, that changes the calculus. If your company receives regular payments from the US and conversion speed matters more than card features, look at Higlobe and TechFX. Every page in this cluster links to current fee tables so you can verify numbers before switching.

What customers love about Ruvo

Hear how Ruvo transforms financial journeys

Saves money. The smartest option for CNPJs.

Profile photo of David Kang

David Kang

Software Engineer, Turn.io

Ruvo simplifies our entire international financial workflow.

Profile photo of Joao Alvarenga

Joao Alvarenga

CEO, Antonnia AI

The best option for earning in USD.

Profile photo of Bruno Pazinato

Bruno Pazinato

Staff Engineer, Salsa

Frequently asked questions

Common questions when comparing international accounts.

Talk to support
  • Look beyond the advertised fee: add IOF, the spread baked into the rate, fixed fees and settlement time. An account with "no FX fee" can cost more than one with an explicit fee and 0% IOF.

  • IOF applies to FX operations and international cards and can reach 3.5% or more. Stablecoin-rail solutions like Ruvo keep 0% IOF, which changes the total cost significantly.

  • Third-party fees change often. The values on these pages reflect public data from mid-2026; always confirm current fees on official sites before deciding.

  • It depends on your volume and priorities. For most freelancers who want to minimise IOF and use a card abroad, Ruvo is the strongest all-round option. For those already invested heavily in Nomad Invest at Tier 5 ($20k+), the tier rate can make Nomad competitive — though IOF of 1.1% still applies. Read the Nomad vs Ruvo page for the tier-by-tier maths.

  • Yes, and many people do. Common setups include receiving via Ruvo (0% IOF) and converting to reais when the rate is good, or receiving business payments through Higlobe for volume and using a Ruvo card for personal spending abroad. There is no rule against holding accounts with multiple platforms.

  • Each comparison notes when fees differ by account type. Ruvo's conversion rate is 0.3% for PJ and 0.5% for PF. Wise and Nomad apply the same IOF to both. Higlobe and TechFX are business-only (PJ). Every comparison page flags which rates apply to which account type.

Ready to Ruvo?

Start using Ruvo today and take control of your money.